Peer Review Process

We follow double double-blinded peer review process. In this process, the author’s names and affiliations will not be exposed to Editors and Reviewers and authors are also kept blinded from Reviewer information.
 

 Responsibilities

After receiving the manuscript from the Editorial Board, the Reviewer should respond whether he considering the manuscript or not in a couple of days, based on his expertise. After accepting the manuscript, the reviewer could provide his decisions as below after completing the peer review process to the editorial office.

(i) Accepted – If the manuscript is completely relevant and well written
(ii) Rejected – If the manuscript is irrelevant
(iii) Need to send Revision – If any minor corrections to be done for the manuscript

1. The reviewer must not be biased and transparent in his decision.
2. The reviewer should provide the decisions on the timeline i.e. one week after accepting the manuscript.
3. The reviewer should respect the confidentiality of the information in the manuscript till it gets published.
4. The final decision in accepting/ rejecting the manuscript is solely decided by the Chief-Editor of the journal.
5. For any conflicts with the manuscript/ authors/ editors he should contact the editorial office.
6. We kindly welcome the reviewer’s suggestions to develop the journal.